Golden Nugget Letter From The CEO VIP Weekend Giveaway
Marketing
IMPORTANT: This is not a gaming site. Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy
 

 

11 OF 15 WINNING FRIDAYS

 

+137.75 DIMES!

 

3 STRAIGHT WINNING WEDNESDAYS

 

+70 DIMES!

 


 

WEDNESDAY'S ACTION

 

15 DIME

WINNER #2 IN A ROW

 

Giants vs. Diamondbacks

 

15 Dime winner on Tuesday:

Rockies over Reds

 

BONUS PLAY

 

5 Dime: Reds vs. Rockies

 

4-0 MLB RUN

(+50 DIMES)

 


 

THE BIG PLAY SPECIALIST DOES IT AGAIN!

 

HIGHEST-RATED NBA PLAY

OF MY CAREER HITS!

 

60 DIME

NBA WINNER #2 IN A ROW

 

Celtics over Lakers - WINNER (June 10)

 

60 DIME WINNER #1:

Thunder over Lakers (April 20)

 

Scroll down to "NBA Scorecard" for my analysis from these HUGE winners!

 


 

TUESDAY'S RECAP

 

15 DIME: Rockies over Reds - WINNER

10 DIME: Dodgers-Padres UNDER - WINNER

 

-25 DIMES

 


 

4-0 BCS BOWL GAME SWEEP

 

30 Dime: Florida over Cincinnati

20 Dime: Boise State over TCU

20 Dime: Iowa-Georgia Tech UNDER

40 Dime: Alabama over Texas

 

+110 Dimes in the biggest College Football games of the season!

 


 

NFL SCORECARD

 

54-39 Monday Night Football run

5-1 Thursday run

24-14 Sunday Night Football run (3-0 this year)

86-68-1 Prime-Time Roll since 2006

2-1 with 60 Dime plays

12-7 roll with 30 Dime plays

9-4 roll with 25 Dime plays

3-2 roll with 20 Dime plays

14-9 roll with NFL Totals releases

25-12 roll with NFL free plays

 


 

NBA SCORECARD

 

354-295-8 since 2005-06 season

 

4-0 SWEEP TO END 2010 NBA FINALS

(+135 DIMES)

 

2-0 with 60 Dime plays

2-0 run with 30 Dime plays

14-9 with 20 Dime plays

55-30-5 run with 15 Dime plays (17-6-5 last 27 ... 5-0 last 5)

27-16-3 run with 10 Dime plays

30-23-1 run with 5 Dime plays

 

Check out my analysis from my two 60 Dime NBA Playoffs Winners:

 

THUNDER (+6 over Lakers on April 20)

 

The L.A. Lakers are going to live to regret not stepping on the Thunder’s collective throat when they had the chance on Sunday. Go back to Game 1: Los Angeles jumped out to a 27-13 first-quarter lead and then ran that to a 17-point advantage early in the second quarter. But instead of keeping their foot on the gas and squashing their young opponent’s confidence, they allowed Oklahoma City to hang around the rest of the way. And even though the Lakers never lost the lead, the fact the Thunder got off to a slow start and saw their best player struggle with his shot all day and yet still kept it competitive the entire second half was almost like a win for Oklahoma City.

 

No question, after the way Game 1 went down, the Thunder know they can compete with the Lakers. And I don’t care how good of a defender Artest is (and he’s good), there’s no way Durant is going to stink up the joint as bad as he did in Game 1. Durant, the NBA’s regular-season scoring champ, will have his playoff coming-out party tonight, I’m absolutely certain of that.

 

Back to the Lakers. You may or may not recall that last year, prior to the NBA Finals, they had issues with game-to-game consistency in the postseason. For instance, in their first 16 playoff games last year, they went 7-9 ATS, and during that stretch they cashed in consecutive postseason contests just once.

 

Consistency has been a big problem for Los Angeles in recent weeks, too. Going back to the All-Star break, the Lakers are just 9-19-1 ATS, and not once during this span have they posted back-to-back ATS wins. More to the point, you have to go back more than two months for the last time L.A. won two straight games by a comfortable margin (at least eight points).

 

As for the Thunder, it’s true that they’ve hit a bit of a wall at the worst possible time, losing five of seven games since April 6. But look how competitive Oklahoma City was in those five defeats: one-point overtime road loss to the Jazz (and they got hosed by the refs at the end of that one); four-point home loss to the Nuggets; three-point road loss to the Warriors; eight-point road loss to Portland; eight-point road loss to the Lakers. In fact, Oklahoma City has been blown out just once (121-101 loss at Indiana) since March 3, and its last seven losses were by an average of 4.6 ppg.

 

Also, while the Lakers have covered in consecutive games just once in their last 29 outings, the Thunder have failed to cash in consecutive games just six times this entire season! In fact, going back to last season, Oklahoma City is an incredible 42-17 ATS in its last 59 games after a non-cover, while the Lakers are 0-9 ATS in their last nine after an ATS win. Furthermore, the Thunder are on pointspread runs of 13-6 as a road underdog, 8-2 as an underdog of five to 10½ points (all on the road), and 47-21 after a SU loss, while L.A. is on ATS slides of 3-9-1 at home, 7-16-1 as a favorite and 0-5 when coming off a SU victory.

 

Finally, I told you guys in this space yesterday that it was only a matter of time before underdogs (and road teams) started to break through from a pointspread perspective in these playoffs. And sure enough, the Bulls and Jazz proved me right (with Utah winning outright, just like I told you they’d likely do).

 

Do I see Oklahoma City securing a similar outright upset here? I’ll say this: I wouldn’t be at all surprised if it happened, because Durant is going to be supremely motivated to make amends for a shaky Game 1 performance. But we don’t need the Thunder to pull off the shocker. They just have to keep it close, and they’ll do just that from start to finish. Grab the points and watch this one come down to the final possession.

 

RESULT: Lakers 95, Thunder 92

 

------

 

CELTICS (-4 over Lakers on June 10)

 

First off, the zigzag theory is in full effect here, with the Lakers winning Games 1 and 3 convincingly, and Boston taking the middle contest (in Los Angeles). In retrospect, it’s not very surprising as these are two evenly matched squads. Remember, they split two regular-season games, with each winning on the other’s home court by a single point. That means these teams have alternated wins and losses in their five clashes this season.

 

So even without factoring in anything else, I’d be comfortable coming BIG with the Celtics tonight. The fact Boston is in an absolute must-win situation – there’s no chance the C’s are winning three in a row vs. the Lakers, including Games 6 and 7 in Los Angeles – makes me even MORE confident that Boston is the right side tonight. And even though Kobe and his posse would never in a million years admit it, the Lakers are at a psychological disadvantage tonight because they stole Game 3. It’s only natural for L.A. – especially with head cases like Lamar Odom and Ron Artest – to relax a bit tonight. Not for the entire game, but just stretches here and there, which is exactly what happened in the Game 2 loss at home.

 

Also, I’d never hint at any Tim Donaghy-like fix, but I am convinced the refs will give the Celtics the benefit of the whistle at every turn tonight. They know an extended series only means more work, right?

 

Now let’s focus on what the Celtics have done in these playoffs when coming off a loss.

 

They fell to Miami 101-92 in Game 4 in the opening round, and bounced back with a 96-86 home win as a 7-point favorite to close out the series.

 

They fell 101-93 in Cleveland in Game 1 of the Eastern Conference semifinals, and bounced back with a 104-86 blowout win as a six-point underdog in Game 2.

 

They fell 124-95 to the Cavs at home in the very next game (as a one-point chalk), and bounced back with a 97-87 win as a 1½-point home underdog in the next game.

 

They fell 96-92 in overtime in Game 4 against Orlando in the Eastern Conference semifinals, then went to Orlando for Game 5 and were victimized by horrendous officiating in a 113-92 loss. However, they came right back and put the Magic away with a 96-84 rout as a 3 ½-point home favorite in Game 6.

 

Finally, they fell 102-89 at Los Angeles in Game 1 of this series, only to rebound with a 103-94 win as a six-point pup on Sunday.

 

That puts Boston at 5-1 SU and ATS when coming off a loss in these playoffs, and all five wins were very easy (and as noted above, the one loss was an officiating disgrace!).

 

Finally, the Lakers have won consecutive road games just once in these playoffs (Games 3 and 4 of a sweep of Utah a month ago). Take away the Jazz series, and L.A. is just 3-5 SU and ATS as a visitor in the postseason.

 

Bottom line: The Celtics are winning this game tonight, and if history is any indication – their five previous playoff wins when coming off a defeat were by an average of 11.8 ppg – it’s not going to be close at all.

 

Your 60 Dime NBA Winner #2 in a Row is the Celtics, and we’ll call for a 103-88 final.

 

RESULT: Celtics 96, Lakers 89

 


 

RATINGS SCORECARD

(All Sports)

 

2-0 run with 75 Dime plays

4-2 run with 60 Dime plays

68-54-1 run with 50 Dime plays (2-1 last 1)

5-3 run with 30 Dime plays

33-24-1 run with 20 Dime plays (5-3-1 last 9)

7-4 run with 10 Dime plays

 


 

FREE-PLAY SCORECARD

 

123-96-2 last 221 days

 

TUESDAY'S FREEBIE RESULT:

A's run-line over Mariners - Loser

 

If you're not reading my free selection daily

you're missing out on EASY money!

 


 
Jeff Benton's Rating System

My selections are rated on a 10 Dime to 100 Dime basis, usually going in 10 Dime increments.

Now, will I occasionally release something bigger than a 100 Dime play? Absolutely - if the situation warrants.

So, how does this all apply with money management basic? Good question. Read on:

No matter the sport, I play one "unit" per star rating that I release.  It is just that simple.

Now, you have to define what a unit is in relation to your personal bankroll. Perhaps one unit = one dollar. Maybe one unit = 10 cents. Whatever the case, you have to decide in order to effectively use a money management system in relation to the size of your bankroll.

Once again, you have to determine what a "unit" is worth to you. Then, using my rating system to see how strong my play is according to the dime rating.

With money management the bottom line is this. "Only wager what you can afford to lose."

 

Complimentary Selection

Make sure you scroll up on this page and jump on my fifth and sixth straight baseball winners, highlighted by my 15 Dime Winner #2 in a Row on Giants-Diamondbacks. Not only have I nailed four consecutive baseball winners, but I’ve also delivered three consecutive winning Wednesdays for 70 Dimes!

 

Now on to Wednesday’s freebie – and I remain on a 123-96-2 roll with plays that I’m giving away – as we’ll go to Pittsburgh and play the Pirates as a home ‘dog against slumping Atlanta.

 

Credit the young Pirates for continuing to fight despite the fact their season effectively ended back on Opening Day. They’ve won back-to-back games in this series, holding the potent Braves lineup to a single run, and they’re 3-2 on their current homestand. Pittsburgh has actually been very respectable at PNC Park (33-38, compared with 14-53 on the road).

 

Meanwhile, the Braves have lost three in a row and five out of six to fall out of first place in the N.L. East. Four of those five losses have come on the highway, where Atlanta is now 11 games under .500 (at home, Bobby Cox’s club is an MLB-best 49-19). Given the home-road dichotomies for these squads, it’s not surprising that the host has won the six straight meetings in this rivalry.

 

Can’t trust Atlanta right-hander Derek Lowe right now, either. He’s got a 6.75 ERA in his last three starts, and the Braves are 3-10 in his last 13 starts, including six straight losses on the road. Lowe’s struggles are at least in part due to the fact he’s pitching with a bone chip in his right elbow.

 

The Braves have dropped six straight games as a road favorite and six of their last eight against left-handed starters – in fact, Atlanta hits just .222 on the road against lefties. Tonight, they match up against Pittsburgh southpaw Zach Duke, who is 2-0 with a 4.67 ERA in his last three starts.

 

(based on a 1♦ to a 10♦ Rating)

 

3♦ PITTSBURGH PIRATES

 

Member Login